Babylon Today    |   home
What Happened?   |   Why Babylon?   |   Solutions   |   Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit   |   Abortion   |   Salvation   |   End-Time Scenario   |   Episcopalians   |   Charities and Organizations   |   The Environment   |   Forestry   |   The Constitution   |   Page of Outrage   |   The U.N.   |   General Assets   |   Stocks Bonds   |   General Politics   |   Politics 2004   |   Politics 2006-2008   |   Politics 2009-end   |   Bahamas Freedom   |   Instructions   |   My Purpose   |   OBAMACARE / HILLARYCARE   |   THE DEMOCRAT PLANTATIONS   |   NATIONAL DEBT CLOCK
THE DEMOCRAT PLANTATIONS
Not that far back in our nation's history black people voted Republican, because the Republican party then, as today, fought for the constitutionally protected God-given rights to freedom, liberty and self-determination for all Americans. At the same time the Democrat party has ever increasingly infringed on our God-given rights, while having stood staunchly as the party of slavery, and separate, reduced rights, for blacks. Indeed so much so that when the 13th Amendment that abolished slavery was passed in 1865, 100% of congressional Republicans supported it while only 23% of congressional Democrats did.

"During the Civil War era, the "Radical Republicans" were given that name by Democrats because they wanted to not only end slavery but also to endow the freed slaves with full citizenship, equality, and rights."
http://russp.us/racism.htm

"The 14th Amendment, giving full citizenship to freed slaves, passed in 1868 with 94% Republican support and 0% Democrat support in congress. The 15th Amendment, giving freed slaves the right to vote, passed in 1870 with 100% Republican support and 0% Democrat support in congress."

As Democrat's opportunity to enslave blacks and infringe on their God-given constitutional rights diminished, and their ability to oppress blacks waned, Democrats formed their military wing - the Ku Klux Klan - with a mission to terrorize freed slaves as well as Republicans who sympathized with them.

Democrats did become a little more civilized by the 1960's, but still turned in a poorer showing in regard to:  "The historic Civil Rights Act of 1964 was supported by a higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats in both houses of Congress. In the House, 80 percent of the Republicans and 63 percent of the Democrats voted in favor. In the Senate, 82 percent of the Republicans and 69 percent of the Democrats voted for it."
http://russp.us/racism.htm

Democrat President Lyndon Johnson, who eventually had to sign it into law, repeatedly referred to the Civil Rights Act as the "nig**r bill". The following quotes are attributed to Johnson:

These Negroes, they’re getting pretty uppity these days and that’s a problem for us since they’ve got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we’ve got to do something about this, we’ve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference."—LBJ

I’ll have those nig**rs voting Democratic for the next 200 years." —Lyndon B. Johnson to two governors aboard Air Force One


Yet even after another 50 years of nearly continuous Democrat control of government since Malcolm X spoke those words, the black community still votes for Democrats.


And what did their loyalty to the Democrat party get the black community? Well Barak Obama enjoys his house in Hawaii, lots of rounds of golf at posh resorts, and rubbing elbows with the wealthy elites on Martha's Vinyard. Michelle Obama enjoys a mother-daughter 5-day luxury vacation in Spain. "Her entourage did book 60 rooms at one posh hotel, where the average room price is about $660, and claimed more rooms elsewhere."

Now scroll down to the pictures of the once-grand now-dilapidated houses, down on the Democrat plantations, that those who voted Democrats into the White House received in return.

While some question the source of what was previously quoted from Johnson, his liberal use of the "n" word and the democrat's showing in their vote on the Civil Rights Act of the 1960s makes clear which of the two parties was more reluctant to pass it, reinforcing the likely veracity of the quotes. Considering what continuous democrat rule, along with the destruction of traditional American moral and family values by their Democrat Hollywood cronies, has done to the black community since then - in the breakdown of the family unit resulting in ever more dependence on government - that second quote attributed to Johnson would seem to have been prophetic, whether spoken or not. It's the result of the classic progressive/Marxist promise to grow government and loot from productive enterprise while handing-down some of the spoils, as opposed to the conservative goal of reducing government thereby favoring conditions for economic growth and a private sector hand-up, to join the rest of society.

So it would seem the most significant "shift" the Democrat party underwent in terms of race, was a recognition that they could use the black population to gain and maintain political power, by pandering to them with empty promises of upward mobility and resulting prosperity - that could never be realized through universally failed, business killing, tax-and-regulate "progressive" policies, that could only result in the exact opposite of what was promised - thereby keeping the blacks down on the Democrat plantation through empty promises of "hope and change" as has been demonstrated so conclusively by crumbling urban areas that have been ruled by Democrats for the last 50 years.

".....Clinton admitted during a Goldman Sachs speech she was “far removed” from the middle class, and yet another in which “Clinton campaign surrogate Bill Ivey talks about the need to maintain political power by producing ‘an unaware and compliant citizenry.'” Which is another way of saying "sheeple", or the exact opposite of our forefathers.

Image search more

As a demonstration of the continuing racism and hypocrisy in the Democrat party, where was the Democrat media and so oft easily-offended plantation overseer's outrage expressed, against Democrat Senator Robert Byrd - who not only founded but was a "Kleagle" and the first elected "Exalted Cyclops" of his local chapter of the Ku Klux Klan - about whom rather than expressing outrage, the democrat plantation overseers instead dutifully carried their plantation's votes to Byrd through their silence, for over 50 years? Just imagine the cacophony of shrill voices there would have been in the Democrat controlled mainstream media, if Byrd had been a republican, outside the Democrat plantation!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Byrd#Ku_Klux_Klan

Hillary "oops" Clinton described Robert "sheets" Byrd not only as her "friend and mentor" but as "a man of surpassing eloquence and nobility" as well as the Senate's "heart, soul and historian" who was "generous with his time and wisdom".


Democrat union boss plantation overseers destroyed the auto industry in Detroit through decades of unrealistic wage and benefit demands, that killed jobs of auto workers of all races, resulting in much of the auto industry springing up in the southern U.S. where it continues to thrive today. Of course the AFL-CIO is up to its eyeballs in election fraud toward plantation maintenance. As one of Hillary's hired thugs reported:  "But the reality is, a lot of people, especially, our union guys, a lot of union guys, they'll do whatever you want. They're rock 'n roll."


Hillary's operatives describe how to commit voter fraud on a massive scale. Mainstream media outlets were going to report it, but spiked it for fear of retrubution from a future Hillary Clinton Administration.


Our continuously Democrat ruled cities like Detroit and Chicago exhibit the same result that socialism wreaked upon the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Cuba and everywhere else it has been instituted. The end result of big government confiscation, consumption and redistribution of the fruit of productive enterprise, is always equally shared misery. As Obama put Marxism "Let's spread the wealth around". While Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton refer to the greater fruit realized by one person working harder than another as "income inequality". Or as Karl Marx described the Dems goals "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."

The Democrats regulatory destruction of the coal industry resulted in the bankruptcy of a 130 year old company and loss of much of an industry and thereby pensions and health care for tens of thousands of mining workers, who now look to government for aid, after the Dems destroyed their employment. Or as Hillary candidly put it while on the campaign trail “We’re going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business.


The double whammy of course being that the cost of electricity then goes up, further impoverishing the very people they put out of work, along with poor people of all races that can least afford the increase in their electric bills. As Hillary so compassionately put it back in the early 1990s, when told that her plan for health care would bankrupt so many small businesses, "I can’t be responsible for every under-capitalized small business in America!"

Democrats increasing joblessness and thus people living in poverty, that are further disadvantaged educationally by NEA-broken school systems that entrap them on the urban plantations, provide an ever expanding pool of - particularly black and Hispanic - Democrat voters who amazingly continue to make the 50-year-running mistake of believing the Democrat's false promises of prosperity.

What minority community has suffered the most, from democrat policies of ignoring borders and overstayed visas that resulted in unfettered illegal immigration, through which U.S. citizens are displaced in the workplace? Yet blacks continue to vote in the highest percentages for the very party that has caused, and benefits from, their demise. Minorities still voting for Democrats even as the Dems promise to import millions upon millions more indigents to displace blacks as well as legal Mexican immigrants in the entry-level workplace, with Hillary Clinton even desiring to bring in 65,000 Syrian "refugees" of whom a majority would be sharia law favoring Muslims that are hostile to our Constitution and form of government and thus do not share our western values and God-given rights of freedom and liberty and particularly the right to self-determination, much less have an interest in assimilating into our society and American way of life.

It's no coincidence that the cities in the greatest decline in America have been ruled by Democrats for a half-century or more. These cities and their dilapidated houses exhibit the end result of what those same democrat progressive policies would produce on a national scale, through the confiscation of ever more capital from the private sector only to have it consumed and squandered by government. Our crumbling cities have been the victim of classic democrat job-killing policies of over-taxing and over-regulating private enterprise, under their continuing delusional belief that capital is best utilized by an unaccountable ever expanding government, rather than by people who would otherwise cautiously and efficiently invest it to better their own lives along with those that are provided employment all the way down the line.

Taxes are increased only to squander the added revenue on yet more failed progressive ideas, which cause companies to either go out of business or leave to set up in more business friendly jurisdictions, which of course shrinks tax revenue, that results in the short-sighted knee-jerk progressive's solution of raising taxes to make up for the shortfall, which of course drives out more business and continues the now 50-year cycle of destruction of our inner-cities. Which in turn further expands the pool of Democrat voters that, amazingly, continue to drink the progressive's Kool-Aid.

"The Democratic Party acts like it owns black people and its founder literally did own black people."

Why would blacks or Hispanics vote for a party that promises to increase the number of indigent immigrants by millions, to compete ever more fiercely with blacks and legal Hispanic immigrants for entry level jobs in the workplace, while at the same time reducing the number of jobs available through additional job-killing taxation and regulation? We should all feel compassion for urban minorities and their plight from having been ruled over, and thus victimized by, their Democrat overlords for the last half-century.

During times of economic stagnation discussion of minimum wage arises, because workers must compete with each other for the limited number of jobs that are available, which reduces the amount that employers need to pay. During times of robust economic growth employers must compete with each other for employees, which results in their having to offer higher wages, in order to both keep current and attract new employees. Which employers can afford because favorable economic conditions result in higher profits.

The more people Democrats can make dependent on government through slow economic growth, the more votes they will receive from the underclass they create, by promising them an ever greater share of the confiscated fruit of the labor of their fellow citizens. As the Soviet Socialist Republics aptly demonstrated, and Margaret Thatcher well stated, "The trouble with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." Yet our institutions of "higher" "education" continue to churn out Marxist journalists (only 7% of journalists are Republican), by destroying young people's capacity for critical thought through indoctrination, rather than education. Without their Democrat mainstream media's unflagging support, the failed Democrat party would have died long ago.

The Democrat party is beholden to big labor and in particular the National Education Association, that has prevented innovative and proven alternative solutions to education from being introduced into our inner city public school systems, which further reduces opportunity and keeps the underclass on the Democrat plantation. Do we have to wonder why the NEA continues to prevent school systems from being able to fire bad teachers and reform those public schools that have so failed minorities?
"From 1989 through the 2014 election cycle, the NEA spent over $92 million on political campaign contributions, 97% of which went to Democrats."

Could it really be that the only reason minorities vote for Democrats, is because they drink the Kool-Aid of the party that pretends to bleed for them, even as the matter of fact historical reality of the Democrat party has been one of slavery, oppression and misery for black and Hispanic citizens? Who continue to unfailingly vote for the party that has been responsible for ever diminishing opportunity and downward mobility for minority communities with the repeatedly proven false promise of prosperity through socialism.

Islamic slavery of Africans has been practiced continuously for nearly 1400 years and has always constituted the worst of it:


Including in the world today:


In the African slave trade Arab Muslims and African converts to Islam rounded up villages of Africans and put them in chains, with estimates ranging to well over a hundred million that were enslaved or marched to their death toward utilization in the Middle East, while about 10% of that number were loaded aboard ships for export to North and South America.

So in the slave trade there were the formerly free Africans, that were captured and delivered to the overseers that kept them on plantations, for the benefit of their masters.

Is it a stretch to view today's inner cities as being composed of formerly free blacks of formerly intact families and communities of the first half of the 20th century, increasingly disempowered through "liberal economic enslavement" on the Democrat plantations, that is advanced by self-enriching self-appointed spokesmen like Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton in the role of overseers, assuring their subject's performance in the voting booths toward the financial benefit and personal power of congressional, mayoral and union boss Democrats that have lorded over the black community for the last 50 years?

Race baiters like Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton and other "community organizers" it would seem, were not talented or motivated enough to go out and create wealth, but instead preferred to find other ways to fund (in part through tax fraud and evasion) their sitting around and complaining about a lack of opportunity that they themselves have perpetuated, while devoting their time to the task of plantation maintenance. At the same time achievers like black brain surgeon Ben Carson and black businessman Herman Cain worked hard to walk off of the plantation. That's why Jackson and Sharpton are "progressive" socialist/Marxist Democrats that parasitize the wealth that others create, while Carson and Cain are constitutional conservatives that participate in our economy and create wealth like so many before them, that helped to make our once-great Republic what it once was.

Democrats continue to succeed by making the unwary believe that government is the solution to their problems, while those that have taken the initiative to work hard enough to escape the Democrat plantation, know first-hand what ever-increasing regulatory and tax burdens have done to productive enterprise in our inner cities. Ironically, rather than their drive and subsequent success resulting in their being held up as examples to the community, those that worked to escape the plantation are treated as pariahs and labeled "Uncle Toms" by the unproductive Democrat plantation overseers.

The same tired old 1960s-shaped progressive Democrat overseers continue to increase the black community's dependence on them/government, by reducing opportunity through ever more broken businesses and increasing joblessness resulting in yet more poverty, which enables them to collect the votes that their Democrat Masters need for reelection to maintain their personal wealth and power. With the Dems latest ambition being to add even more millions of immigrants to our welfare roles, which will result in further impoverishment particularly of inner city U.S. citizens, with simultaneous increased empowerment for Democrat politicians who will continue to further deceive their hapless victims.

In spite of all of the historical evidence that proves them wrong, from the former Soviet Socialist Republics to Cuba along with all of the other failed socialist/communist slave states around the world, Democrats somehow still believe that confiscating capital from the private sector that could otherwise be invested by self-interested parties to create jobs, is instead better utilized by an ever more bloated government devoid of self-interest, to fuel an ever larger Soviet-socialist-style centrally planned economy with an unaccountable public sector as employer. However I am confident there is no shortage of Democrats that are intelligent enough to not drink their own Kool-Aid, but are immoral enough to peddle it, solely for personal political power and money. Proposing devices like "infrastructure banks", and other classical tools of tin-pot dictators, that serve as giant unaccounted slush funds squandered to reward cronies that helped put them in office, such as crony capitalists, labor union bosses and other plantation overseers.

If Hillary is elected the Clinton's brand, of raw greed-driven pay-to-play that resulted in further impoverishment of 3rd world countries - while landing two hundred and fifty million dollars in the Clinton's personal bank account with another 2 billion pledged to their private "foundation", while selling America to our enemies and morally reprobate crony capitalists as detailed in the following video - will have been given license to continue the same from the White House with the added power of owning the FBI (as Hillary already seems to) and justice department (as the Clinton's also already seem to), while she would appoint and own a Supreme Court majority, circuit courts, and thus the Constitution itself. With the end of free speech being at the top of the list. Remember that "President Bill Clinton, summarily fired all 93 U.S. Attorneys on a single day, March 23, 1993" including the U.S. Attorney presiding over the Clinton's Whitewater scandal, never caring a whit that the vacant seats would back up Federal courts for months as replacement Attorneys were slowly appointed. Expect far, far, worse treatment of the few remaining non-raging-liberal appointees in government, than Hillary and Bill gave to the employees of the White House Travel Office.